Military discipline and punishments Military discipline and punishments

Winning a war inevitably demands the need to maintain discipline and order in the troop ranks . The Austro-Hungarian Imperial and Royal Army tried to enforce this order with a strict military penal code, which severely condemned even minor infractions and sometimes used methods bordering on torture to “discipline” its soldiers. The Tyrolean Standschützen and irregular army units had a dubious reputation for not responding well to military order and training. In fact, the files of the Standschützen Baon Innsbruck I contain a series of punishments and crimes of various kinds. Desertion or unauthorized absence of troops was at the top of the list of military offenses in the.1Überegger, Militärgerichtsbarkeit, pp. 421–437. In April 1916, some officers were found in San Candido/Innichen.2Tiroler Landesarchiv, Standschützen Baon Innsbruck I 1914-1918, Faszikel I, K.u.k. Grenzunterabschnittskommando 10b Reservat-Grenzunterabschnittskommandobefehl Nr. 1, Feldpost 222, am 19. April 1916. The situation was quite different in the case of five Standschützen who, on July 12, 1916, obtained permission to pick flowers after dinner near the Schusterhütte, but who strayed too far from their camp “because of the zeal to find edelweiss”. They were immediately reprimanded for the.3Tiroler Landesarchiv, Standschützen Baon Innsbruck I 1914-1918, Faszikel I, K.k. Standschützen-Baon Innsbruck Nr. 1, Nr. 941, Feldpost 222, am 14. Juli 1916. In this painful method of punishment, the soldiers’ right forearm was tied to the lower left leg with a buckle, and they were made.4Tiroler Landesarchiv, Standschützen Baon Innsbruck I 1914-1918, Faszikel I, K.k. Standschützen-Baon Innsbruck Nr. 1, Nr. 941, Feldpost 222, am 14. Juli 1916.
For the smooth functioning of the chain of command, absolute obedience was necessaryto the maintenance of military discipline. During a night firefight in June 1916 on the Sasso di Sesto/Sextenstein, a detachment of machine guns received orders to cease fire immediately. The commanding officer’s order answered: “They have no right to give me orders!” Only by threatening the detachment with his rifle did the commander succeed in obtaining obedience and the person responsible was brought to justice.5Tiroler Landesarchiv, Standschützen Baon Innsbruck I 1914-1918, Faszikel I, K.k. Standschützen-Baon Innsbruck Nr. 1, Nr. 145, Feldpost 222, 10.6.1916 Zinnenstellung.
For “insolent behavior” towards an officer, the Standschütze Karl Doviak was punished with ten days of solitary confinement and three sets of six hours each of “suspenders”.6Tiroler Landesarchiv, Standschützen Baon Innsbruck I 1914-1918, Faszikel VI, Bataillonskommandobefehl Nr. 61, Feldpost 526, am 28. Juni 1917. Even for seemingly minor crimes, such as “smuggling prohibited letters inland”, which often circumvented censorship on letters, Josef Stockner and Franz Stettner were punished with three “suspenders” for six hours.7Tiroler Landesarchiv, Standschützen Baon Innsbruck I 1914-1918, Faszikel VI, Bataillonskommandobefehl Nr. 47, Feldpost 526, am 29. Mai 1917.
The Standschütze Jose[f] Ebensberger received three two-hour “ligatures” “for severe insubordination against his superiors”.8Tiroler Landesarchiv, Standschützen Baon Innsbruck I 1914-1918, Faszikel VI, Bataillonskommandobefehl Nr. 93, Feldpost 526, am 25. April 1916. This method was one of the most famous punishments of the Imperial and Royal Army. The soldier’s forearms were crossed behind his back, with the palms facing upwards, while the arms were tied together with the lower legs.
The misconduct of soldiers, such as hunting without permission9Tiroler Landesarchiv, Standschützen Baon Innsbruck I 1914-1918, Faszikel I, Schuster-Hütte, am 26. Juli 1916., private phone calls to telephone operators10Tiroler Landesarchiv, Standschützen Baon Innsbruck I 1914-1918, Faszikel VI, Battalion Command Order No. 33, Feldpost 526, am 27. Marz 1917. or the refusal of Oberjäger Franz Holzer to be vaccinated,11Tiroler Landesarchiv, Standschützen Baon Innsbruck I 1914-1918, Faszikel VI, Bataillonskommandobefehl Nr. 47, Feldpost 526, am 29. Mai 1917. were also among the crimes committed by soldiers of the Three Peaks front, and were all prosecuted with severe penalties.

(SK)

Überegger, Oswald (2014). Geschichtsschreibung und Erinnerung. In Hermann J.W. Kuprian and Oswald Überegger (eds.), Katastrophenjahre; Der Erste Weltkrieg und Tirol. Innsbruck: Wagner Verlag, 547–563.

Überegger, Oswald (2014). Militärgerichtsbarkeit. In: Katastrophenjahre. Hermann J.W. Kuprian and Oswald Überegger (eds.), Katastrophenjahre; Der Erste Weltkrieg und Tirol. Innsbruck: Wagner Verlag, 421–437.

Tiroler Landesarchiv, Standschützen Baon Innsbruck I 1914-1918, Faszikel I, K.u.k. Grenzunterabschnittskommando 10b Reservat-Grenzunterabschnittskommandobefehl Nr. 1, Feldpost 222, am 19. April 1916.

Tiroler Landesarchiv, Standschützen Baon Innsbruck I 1914-1918, Faszikel I, K.k. Standschützen-Baon Innsbruck Nr. 1, Nr. 941, Feldpost 222, am 14. Juli 1916.

Tiroler Landesarchiv, Standschützen Baon Innsbruck I 1914-1918, Faszikel I, K.k. Standschützen-Baon Innsbruck Nr. 1, Nr. 145, Feldpost 222, 10.6.1916 Zinnenstellung.

Tiroler Landesarchiv, Standschützen Baon Innsbruck I 1914-1918, Faszikel VI, Bataillonskommandobefehl Nr. 61, Feldpost 526, am 28. Juni 1917.

Tiroler Landesarchiv, Standschützen Baon Innsbruck I 1914-1918, Faszikel VI, Bataillonskommandobefehl Nr. 47, Feldpost 526, am 29. Mai 1917.

Tiroler Landesarchiv, Standschützen Baon Innsbruck I 1914-1918, Faszikel VI, Bataillonskommandobefehl Nr. 93, Feldpost 526, am 25. April 1916.

Tiroler Landesarchiv, Standschützen Baon Innsbruck I 1914-1918, Faszikel I, Schuster-Hütte, am 26. Juli 1916.